Digital Cooperation
EuroDIG’s platform to collate European views on the Report of the UN Secretary General’s High-Level Panel on Digital Cooperation
What is the High-Level Panel on Digital Cooperation?
In July 2018, UN Secretary-General António Guterres established a High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation. Co-chaired by Melinda Gates and Jack Ma, the Panel consisted of 22 international experts from governments, the private sector, academia, the technical community and civil society. Its goal was to “advance global multi-stakeholder dialogue on how we can work better together to realize the potential of digital technologies for advancing human well-being while mitigating the risks”.
On 10 June, the Panel submitted its final report titled “The Age of Digital Interdependence” to the UN Secretary General. In the report, the Panel makes 5 sets of recommendations:
- Build an inclusive digital economy and society
- Develop human and institutional capacity
- Protect human rights and human agency
- Promote digital trust, security and stability
- Foster global digital cooperation
You find the report and further information on www.un.org/en/digital-cooperation-panel/.
How can I comment on the HLP report via EuroDIG?
The IGF, EuroDIG and other relevant platforms for inclusive multi-stakeholder dialogue have laid important ground for the work of the Panel and play a key role in discussing digital cooperation and governance. At its preparatory meeting in January 2019, the EuroDIG community decided to provide for a space to discuss and assess the HLP report and collate views from all stakeholders from all over Europe on the report and its recommendations.
EuroDIG is inviting all European stakeholders to express their views via two complementary ways: here on this platform you can comment on specific paragraphs of the report and/or you can send a more holistic assessment of the report and its findings by sending a PDF document to digitalcooperation@EuroDIG.org. The comments received by European stakeholders are published here in the chronological order in which they were received.
The deadline for comments is extended until 15. October 2019. EuroDIG, supported by Mark Carvell, former UK government representative, will then summarise the views received in a single document and make them available to the global public for further discussion at the UN Internet Governance Forum in Berlin in November 2019 or at any other occasion.
It is important to note that EuroDIG sees this process as one opportunity to trigger a debate and exchange on the findings of the Panel and does not intend to consider itself as the only platform to discuss views on and possible follow-up actions to the findings of the report. EuroDIG welcomes other initiatives that provide for a space to discuss and assess the Panel’s report and invites all European stakeholders to also participate in these.
Possible guiding questions for European stakeholders to consider:
The EuroDIG consultation project would be particularly interested in knowing European stakeholders’ views and comments on the following proposals and recommendations described in the UN High Level Panel’s report:
- a multi-stakeholder systems approach for cooperation and development of norms;
- the idea of enshrining underlying values and principles, key functions to be delivered by an improved cooperation architecture in a Global Commitment for Digital Cooperation in order to increase digital inclusiveness globally and thereby contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);
- the need to deepen understanding of the political, social, cultural and economic impacts of digital technologies;
- the development of a Global Commitment on Digital Trust and Security for implementing agreed norms and principles, and for increasing information sharing in order to promote greater trust in the digital age;
- the creation of a multi-stakeholder alliance to create a platform for sharing and investing in digital public goods that would serve to expand access to digital infrastructure;
- the need to generate more data relevant to SDGs and ensure data collaboration in areas such as health, agriculture, climate change and the environment;
- agreement on a set of global metrics for digital inclusiveness;
- establishment of a global digital “helpdesk”-function to support stakeholders from small and developing countries
- the call for social media enterprises to work with governments and civil society on responses to human rights violations;
- the need for regional and global standards in taxation, consumer protection and competition in international e-commerce and digital cooperation.
European stakeholders’ comments and views are also sought on the merits of the panel’s analysis of the existing GAPs of the current global cooperation architecture (see chapter 4 of the report), the principles and key functions for an improved cooperation architecture (see Annex VI of the report), and three options set out in the HLP’s report for improving the existing architecture for global digital cooperation:
- an “Internet Governance Forum Plus” (IGF Plus) institutionally anchored in the UN system to develop policies and norms of direct interest to stakeholder communities, add capacity and support specific activities through a “Cooperation Accelerator”, an advisory group, a policy incubator, an observatory and a help desk;
- a “Distributed Co-Governance Architecture” (COGOV) of new cooperation networks of experts and support platforms that would address gaps in existing mechanisms through focussing on coordinating the design, development, adoption, implementation and enforcement of global norms for digital cooperation;
- a “Digital Commons Architecture” to increase knowledge-sharing and learning and for creating synergies through a repository of norms and governance practices, with multi-stakeholder project-based tracks which are focussed on promoting specific SDGs and risks of social harms.
Finally, Stakeholders’ comments are sought on the consideration in the HLP’s report on the role of the UN generally in adding value to the digital transformation, citing for example the UN Innovation Network for sharing best practice, and the UN Data Innovation Lab and the High Level Committee on Programmes which serves to share knowledge and expand initiatives across relevant UN agencies. Specifically, the HLP invites the Secretary-General to consider appointing a “Tech Envoy” to oversee the UN’s role in advancing digital cooperation and to track progress.
Recent Comments on this Site
3rd July 2024 at 2:48 pm
The ideas discussed in this session were much broader. I propose to ionclude the following:
Citizens’ expectations from governments are increasing, and effective use of digital technologies can help meet these demands. Beyond technology development, it’s essential to cultivate digital skills and a forward-thinking mindset in the public sector. The main challenge is changing work habits and focusing on problem-solving before technology implementation. Digital services must be citizen-centric, secure, and user-friendly.
Open policy-making and innovative thinking are crucial, along with safe experimentation spaces like GovTech Labs. These labs test new policies and technologies, fostering innovation through skill development and co-creation. Design thinking and user experience should prioritize simplicity and functionality.
Success in digital services depends on organizational maturity and a clear vision supported by citizens and legislation. Challenges include digital skill gaps, data analysis capabilities, and regulatory barriers, requiring a shift towards enabling innovation.
Future challenges include digital identification, AI regulations, and ensuring technology accessibility for all, including senior citizens. Practical strategies and public co-creation are necessary for meaningful change.
See in context
3rd July 2024 at 12:27 pm
Like David, I don’t think cybersecurity and ‘crypto-technologists’ should be considered non-technical.
See in context
3rd July 2024 at 12:26 pm
I think Torsten’s suggestion for the last sentence of para.3 is a good one. Ross Anderson’s “chat control” paper made a convincing case that domestic violence and sexual abuse are closely linked, and that preventive measures which ignore one in favour of the other are less likely to be effective.
See in context
3rd July 2024 at 12:14 pm
Thanks Torsten – I think the changes made result in a more balanced statement without sacrificing relevant detail. I remain concerned at the use of the word “exponential” without reference to substantiating evidence, for the reasons I set out in my previous comment.
See in context
3rd July 2024 at 11:04 am
[Watermarking and certification of origin should be a more reliable means to authenticate content and should be supported by regulation.]
I would add here: Watermarking and certification of origin should be a more reliable means to authenticate content and should be supported by regulation, keeping in mind that also these methods can be circumvented.
See in context
3rd July 2024 at 11:01 am
The session organizers and participants modified this message to better reflect the discussion at the workshop as follows:
The interplay of privacy and safety: The participants of Workshop 1a of EuroDIG believe privacy and child safety are intertwined and inseparable, advocating that legal solutions to combat child sexual abuse online must strive to optimise both. These measures should be centred on children’s rights and their best interests, as a way forward to achieve this balance.
See in context
3rd July 2024 at 11:00 am
The session organizers and participants modified this message to better reflect the discussion at the workshop as follows: CSA is currently increasing exponentially and has serious consequences for the rights and development of children. For this reason, recognising such depictions and preventing child sexual abuse should go hand in hand. Participants are concerned about the safety of users, including with regard to the potential use of CSAM detection technology. Breaches of confidential communication or anonymity are seen critically. At the same time, advantages are recognised in the regulations, e.g. with regard to problem awareness or safety by design approaches. Age verification procedures are perceived as both a risk and an advantage, with a caution on risks to anonymity and participation.
See in context
3rd July 2024 at 10:58 am
After a meeting among the workshop organizers, this message was changed as follows: Advancements in legal and regulatory measures on Child Sexual Abuse (CSA): Workshop 1a discussed three recent measures on the protection of children from online Child Sexual Abuse (CSA): the proposed EU CSA Regulation (CSAR), the new UK Online Safety Act, and the positive results from the Lithuanian Law on the Protection of Minors against detrimental effects of public information. An agreement was found on the need for better regulation in this field, emphasising the accountability of online service providers for monitoring illegal and harmful material and safeguarding minors.
See in context
2nd July 2024 at 1:02 pm
From my perspective, the comments on technology take up too much space in this message. This topic was explored in more depth in another workshop. It also leaves too little room for other aspects that played a role in the exchange. Therefore, here is a suggestion to change the message:
CSA is currently increasing exponentially and has serious consequences for the rights and development of children. For this reason, recognising such depictions and preventing sexual violence should go hand in hand. Participants are concerned about the safety of users, including with regard to the potential use of technology. Breaches of confidential communication or anonymity are seen critically. At the same time, advantages are recognised in the regulations, e.g. with regard to problem awareness or safety by design approaches. Age verification procedures are perceived as both a risk and an advantage. It can improve the protection of children on the internet, limit the spread of CSA material and empower children. However, this should not be at the expense of anonymity and participation.
See in context
1st July 2024 at 5:53 pm
New technology-open proposal for the first sentence of the paragraph, as there was no explicit request in the workshop to exclude CCS:
To detect CSAM online, only techniques that can protect privacy by not learning anything about the content of a message other than whether an image matches known illegal content should be used.
See in context